Step 4: Revisiting the hypothesis ：why x>y  contradict to

Let me clarify this point:

### Hypothesis Recap:
1. \( Y_n > X_n \) for all \( n \).
2. \( X_n \) and \( Y_n \) are convergent sequences with limits \( x \) and \( y \) respectively.
3. You are asked to prove that \( y > x \).

### Step 4: Revisiting the Hypothesis

In Step 3, the argument concludes that \( y - x < 2\epsilon \) for any \( \epsilon > 0 \), leading to \( y \leq x \). However, this conclusion seems contradictory to the original assumption that \( Y_n > X_n \) for all \( n \).

### Contradiction Explained:
1. **Assumption**: \( Y_n > X_n \) for all \( n \). This means that every term in the sequence \( Y_n \) is greater than the corresponding term in the sequence \( X_n \).

2. **Conclusion from Step 3**: \( y \leq x \). This suggests that the limit of \( Y_n \), which is \( y \), is less than or equal to the limit of \( X_n \), which is \( x \).

3. **Contradiction**: If \( y \leq x \), this implies that eventually, as \( n \) becomes large, the terms \( Y_n \) and \( X_n \) would get arbitrarily close to \( y \) and \( x \), respectively. However, if \( y \leq x \), then there could exist terms in the sequences where \( Y_n \) might approach or even be equal to \( x \) or less. This directly contradicts the initial condition that \( Y_n > X_n \) for all \( n \).

   - If \( y \leq x \), there would be points where \( Y_n \) and \( X_n \) could not maintain the strict inequality \( Y_n > X_n \) as they approach their limits. Therefore, the strict inequality for all \( n \) cannot hold if \( y \leq x \).

### Conclusion:
Given the strict inequality \( Y_n > X_n \) for all \( n \), and both sequences converging, it must be that \( y > x \) to avoid contradiction. If \( y \leq x \) were true, the condition \( Y_n > X_n \) would eventually be violated as the sequences approach their respective limits.

Would you like more details or have any questions?

Here are 5 related questions:

1. What happens if the sequences are decreasing, but still \( Y_n > X_n \) for all \( n \)?
2. How does this proof generalize to sequences in higher dimensions?
3. Can this method be used to compare limits of non-convergent sequences?
4. How does the concept of "eventual dominance" relate to this proof?
5. How would this proof change if \( Y_n \) and \( X_n \) are not real numbers but complex numbers?

**Tip:** When working with limits, always check if the assumptions about the sequences' behavior hold throughout the entire sequence or just at the limit.

Explore the contradiction involving sequences where Y_n > X_n for all n, yet y ≤ x appears. Learn how this mathematical proof resolves the contradiction with detailed steps and explanations.

Math Problem Statement

Solution

Ask a new question for Free

By Image

Math Problem Analysis

Mathematical Concepts

Formulas

Theorems

Suitable Grade Level

Related Recommendation