https://r2.erweima.ai/mathbot/image/1726483000911si3j5uuf.jpg

The image you provided contains two mathematical problems labeled 12 and 13, with instructions to prove certain vector calculus identities. I will now explain each of these proofs step by step.

### Problem 12

The equations in problem 12 involve vector calculus and surface integrals. They can be interpreted as applications of **Stokes' Theorem**, which relates a surface integral of a curl of a vector field over a surface to a line integral around the boundary of the surface. The equations are:

\[
\int_{S} (\hat{n} \times \nabla \varphi) dS = \oint_{\ell} \varphi d\ell
\]

\[
\int_{S} (\hat{n} \times \nabla) \times \vec{A} \, dS = - \oint_{\ell} \vec{A} \times d\ell
\]

Both expressions use the vector surface element \( dS \) and the line element \( d\ell \), which suggests Stokes' theorem will be used.

#### (a) First Equation Proof

This looks like an application of **Stokes' Theorem**, where \( \nabla \varphi \) is the gradient of a scalar function \( \varphi \), and the integral over the surface relates to the integral over the boundary curve \( \ell \).

The vector identity \( \hat{n} \times (\nabla \varphi) \) forms the tangential component of the gradient, and applying Stokes’ theorem gives the boundary integral of \( \varphi \).

#### (b) Second Equation Proof

The second equation appears to be a more direct application of **Stokes' Theorem** for vector fields. The theorem relates the surface integral of the curl of a vector field \( \vec{A} \) over a surface to the line integral of the vector field along the boundary of the surface. The negative sign may result from the choice of orientation in the curve or surface, which is something that can be confirmed in the detailed proof.

---

### Problem 13

The third equation to prove is:

\[
\nabla \times [f(r)\vec{r}] = 0
\]

This involves the curl of a vector field \( f(r) \vec{r} \), where \( f(r) \) is a scalar function of \( r \), and \( \vec{r} \) is the position vector. Since \( \vec{r} \) points radially outward, and \( f(r) \) depends only on the magnitude \( r \), this setup suggests that the curl should vanish.

#### Proof Outline:

1. The position vector in three-dimensional space can be written as \( \vec{r} = x\hat{i} + y\hat{j} + z\hat{k} \), and the scalar function \( f(r) \) is only a function of the radial distance \( r = \sqrt{x^2 + y^2 + z^2} \).

2. Compute the curl explicitly:
   \[
   \nabla \times (f(r) \vec{r})
   \]

3. Use the product rule for the curl and simplify.

4. Show that the terms cancel out, leaving the result as zero.

---

Would you like me to continue with detailed steps for each of these proofs?

### Further Questions:

1. What is the role of Stokes' Theorem in vector calculus, and how can it be applied to these problems?
2. How does the orientation of the surface and its boundary affect the sign in Stokes' Theorem?
3. What are the necessary conditions for the curl of a vector field to be zero?
4. Can you generalize the result of Problem 13 for other scalar functions multiplied by position vectors?
5. How does the choice of coordinate system affect vector calculus proofs like these?

**Tip:** In vector calculus, using the right-hand rule for the orientation of surfaces and curves helps ensure correct application of Stokes' Theorem and similar identities.

The image contains two mathematical problems involving vector calculus, labeled 12 and 13, requiring proofs of certain vector calculus identities.

This page provides detailed solutions to advanced vector calculus problems, including applications of Stokes' Theorem and proofs involving the curl of vector fields. Learn how to approach surface integrals and vector calculus identities, suitable for advanced calculus students.

Math Problem Statement

Solution

Ask a new question for Free

By Image

Math Problem Analysis

Mathematical Concepts

Formulas

Theorems

Suitable Grade Level

Related Recommendation