find the generators of the ideal defining zariski closure for jukes cantor model for 3 leaves in phylogenetic algebraic geometry 

In phylogenetic algebraic geometry, particularly in the study of the Jukes-Cantor (JC) model for three leaves, the Zariski closure of the associated algebraic variety is of significant interest. The Jukes-Cantor model is a model of DNA sequence evolution on a phylogenetic tree, where all substitutions are equally likely, and it is particularly relevant in evolutionary biology.

### The Ideal Defining the Zariski Closure for the JC Model with 3 Leaves:

For the Jukes-Cantor model on a phylogenetic tree with 3 leaves, the Zariski closure is defined by certain polynomials that generate the ideal associated with this model. These generators describe the relations that must be satisfied by the joint probability distribution of the observed sequences at the leaves.

1. **Phylogenetic Invariants:** These are polynomials that vanish on the variety defined by the JC model. For the 3-leaf case, these invariants can be obtained from the Fourier coordinates used to parameterize the model.

2. **Generators:** For 3 leaves, the ideal is generated by quadratic polynomials that arise from the so-called "edge invariants." These can be described as follows:
    - Let \( p_{ijk} \) denote the probability of observing nucleotide \( i \) at leaf 1, \( j \) at leaf 2, and \( k \) at leaf 3. These probabilities satisfy certain linear and quadratic relations.
    - The generators of the ideal are quadratic binomials of the form \( p_{ijk} p_{lmn} - p_{ijn} p_{lmk} \), where the indices \( i, j, k, l, m, n \) run over the four nucleotides (A, C, G, T).
    
3. **Symmetry and Combinatorial Structure:** Due to the symmetry in the Jukes-Cantor model (all nucleotide transitions are equally probable), the structure of these polynomials reflects this symmetry. Therefore, the generators are symmetric polynomials.

4. **Concrete Example:**
   - Suppose we index the nucleotides \( \{A, C, G, T\} \) as \( \{1, 2, 3, 4\} \). Then one of the generators might be:
   \[
   p_{111} p_{222} - p_{112} p_{221} = 0.
   \]
   - This polynomial reflects a relationship between probabilities corresponding to specific nucleotide patterns across the three leaves.

### Conclusion:
For the Jukes-Cantor model on three leaves, the Zariski closure is defined by an ideal generated by quadratic polynomials that correspond to the phylogenetic invariants of the model. These generators encode the constraints that any probability distribution under the JC model must satisfy.

Would you like to see a more detailed breakdown of the steps in constructing these generators, or do you have specific questions about their derivation?

### Follow-up Questions:
1. What is the significance of the Jukes-Cantor model in phylogenetics?
2. How are the Fourier coordinates used to parametrize the Jukes-Cantor model?
3. Could you explain the concept of a Zariski closure in more detail?
4. How do the edge invariants relate to the structure of the phylogenetic tree?
5. What role does symmetry play in the construction of the generators?
6. Can you provide examples of these generators for a tree with more leaves?
7. How does the Jukes-Cantor model differ from other models like the Kimura model?
8. What are some practical applications of understanding the Zariski closure in evolutionary biology?

**Tip:** When dealing with ideals in algebraic geometry, it is often useful to explore the structure of the generating set and consider symmetries or invariants that may simplify the analysis.

Explore the generators of the ideal defining the Zariski closure for the Jukes-Cantor model with 3 leaves in phylogenetic algebraic geometry. Understand the mathematical foundations and applications of these generators in evolutionary biology.

Math Problem Statement

Solution

Ask a new question for Free

By Image

Math Problem Analysis

Mathematical Concepts

Formulas

Theorems

Suitable Grade Level

Related Recommendation