Let 
f
 be any continuous function on 
[
0
,
2
]
 and twice differentiable on 
(
0
,
2
)
.
 If 
f
(
0
)
=
0
,
 
f
(
1
)
=
1
 and 
f
(
2
)
=
2
,
 then

A
f
′′
(
x
)
>
0
 for all 
x
∈
(
0
,
2
)
B
f
′
(
x
)
=
0
 for some 
x
∈
[
0
,
2
]
C
f
′′
(
x
)
=
0
 for some 
x
∈
(
0
,
2
)
D
f
′′
(
x
)
=
0
 for all 
x
∈
(
0
,
2
)

Given the function \( f \) which is continuous on \([0, 2]\) and twice differentiable on \((0, 2)\), with \( f(0) = 0 \), \( f(1) = 1 \), and \( f(2) = 2 \), we are to determine the correct statements regarding \( f' \) and \( f'' \).

First, we analyze the given information:

1. \( f \) is continuous on \([0, 2]\).
2. \( f \) is twice differentiable on \((0, 2)\).
3. \( f(0) = 0 \), \( f(1) = 1 \), \( f(2) = 2 \).

### Option Analysis:

#### Option A: \( f''(x) > 0 \) for all \( x \in (0, 2) \)
If \( f''(x) > 0 \) for all \( x \in (0, 2) \), then \( f'(x) \) is strictly increasing on \((0, 2)\). However, given the boundary conditions \( f(0) = 0 \), \( f(1) = 1 \), and \( f(2) = 2 \), \( f \) appears to be linear. For a linear function, \( f''(x) = 0 \) everywhere. Thus, this option is not generally valid without additional constraints on \( f \).

#### Option B: \( f'(x) = 0 \) for some \( x \in [0, 2] \)
The function values at the boundary \( f(0) = 0 \) and \( f(2) = 2 \), with \( f(1) = 1 \), suggest that \( f \) is not constant and changes linearly. Therefore, it is unlikely that \( f'(x) = 0 \) for any \( x \in [0, 2] \) because \( f' \) would typically be non-zero over the interval.

#### Option C: \( f''(x) = 0 \) for some \( x \in (0, 2) \)
Given \( f \) is twice differentiable, and the boundary conditions make it likely that \( f(x) \) behaves linearly (or close to linearly). For a linear function \( f(x) = ax + b \), \( f''(x) = 0 \) for all \( x \in (0, 2) \). Therefore, \( f''(x) = 0 \) at some point within \((0, 2)\) seems plausible.

#### Option D: \( f''(x) = 0 \) for all \( x \in (0, 2) \)
If \( f(x) \) is indeed linear, then \( f''(x) = 0 \) for all \( x \in (0, 2) \). This fits the boundary conditions provided and aligns with the behavior of linear functions.

### Conclusion:
Considering the given boundary conditions and the typical behavior of such functions:

- Option C: \( f''(x) = 0 \) for some \( x \in (0, 2) \) is certainly possible.
- Option D: \( f''(x) = 0 \) for all \( x \in (0, 2) \) is also consistent with a linear function \( f(x) = ax + b \).

Both options C and D could be correct, but Option D provides a more complete characterization of \( f \) being linear.

Thus, the most accurate answer is:
**D. \( f''(x) = 0 \) for all \( x \in (0, 2) \)**.

Would you like more details or have any questions?

Here are 8 related questions to expand your understanding:
1. How can we prove that a function is linear if its second derivative is zero?
2. What are the implications of a function being twice differentiable?
3. How does the Mean Value Theorem apply to this problem?
4. Can a non-linear function satisfy \( f(0) = 0 \), \( f(1) = 1 \), and \( f(2) = 2 \)?
5. What role does the Intermediate Value Theorem play in continuous functions?
6. How does the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus relate to this problem?
7. What are the characteristics of a function with \( f''(x) > 0 \)?
8. How does one verify if \( f'(x) = 0 \) at any point given boundary conditions?

**Tip:** When analyzing functions and their derivatives, understanding the relationship between the function's behavior and its derivatives can provide significant insights into the function's characteristics.

Explore the analysis of a continuous function on [0, 2] that is twice differentiable on (0, 2), with specific boundary conditions. Understand the implications of the function's derivatives and their behaviors using calculus concepts. Suitable for advanced high school students and college-level calculus enthusiasts.

Math Problem Statement

Solution

Ask a new question for Free

By Image

Math Problem Analysis

Mathematical Concepts

Formulas

Theorems

Suitable Grade Level

Related Recommendation