# Casio fx-CG50 vs TI-84 Plus CE Review and Comparison

TLDRThis video compares the TI-84 Plus CE and Casio fx-CG50 graphing calculators, highlighting similarities and differences in hardware, software, and capabilities. The Casio excels in exact answer display and 3D graphing, while the TI-84 Plus CE is favored for its intuitive menu system. Both calculators are suitable for standard tests, but the Casio offers a faster calculation speed and a more detailed periodic table, presenting a strong, cost-effective alternative to the widely used TI-84 Plus CE.

### Takeaways

- π The Casio fx-CG50 and TI-84 Plus CE have similar size and shape, with comparable button layouts.
- π The TI-84 Plus CE is slimmer due to a built-in rechargeable lithium-ion battery, while the Casio fx-CG50 uses four AAA batteries.
- π’ Both calculators provide high-resolution color screens, with the Casio's being slightly taller and wider.
- π¨ The Casio features a faux carbon fiber pattern, while the TI-84 Plus CE has a plain matte plastic back and is available in various colors.
- π« Neither calculator has a computer algebra system, limiting operations involving letter variables and solving non-numeric equations.
- π The Casio excels in providing exact answers, such as simplified radical forms and fractions, unlike the TI-84 Plus CE.
- π Both calculators offer a range of functions through their respective menus, with the TI-84 Plus CE having a more user-friendly menu system.
- β±οΈ The Casio fx-CG50 outperforms the TI-84 Plus CE in speed tests for both calculation and graphing tasks.
- π The Casio is faster in graphing functions and can handle 3D graphing, a feature absent in the TI-84 Plus CE.
- π The TI-84 Plus CE is commonly required in high school math classes, but the Casio fx-CG50 is a capable and more affordable alternative.
- π¬ Both calculators have similar apps for spreadsheets, graphing conic sections, value tables, equation solving, programming, financial functions, unit conversion, and periodic tables.

### Q & A

### What are the main differences between the Casio fx-CG50 and the TI-84 Plus CE in terms of hardware?

-The main hardware differences are the thickness, with the TI-84 Plus CE being slimmer due to its built-in rechargeable lithium-ion battery, and the Casio fx-CG50 using four AAA batteries, making it slightly thicker. The Casio also has a fake carbon fiber pattern on the panel behind the buttons, while the TI-84 Plus has plain matte plastic.

### Which calculator has a longer battery life with standard batteries?

-The Casio fx-CG50, which uses four AAA batteries, is expected to have a longer battery life compared to a single charge of the rechargeable battery in the TI-84 Plus CE.

### Can you use rechargeable batteries in the Casio fx-CG50?

-Yes, you can use rechargeable AAA batteries in the Casio fx-CG50 and charge them using the calculator's charging cord without removing them from the calculator.

### How do the color screens of the Casio fx-CG50 and TI-84 Plus CE compare?

-Both calculators have relatively high-resolution color screens that are similarly sized. The Casio's screen is slightly taller and wider.

### Do either of the calculators have a computer algebra system (CAS)?

-No, neither the Casio fx-CG50 nor the TI-84 Plus CE has a computer algebra system, meaning they cannot perform operations involving letter variables or solve equations without plain numeric answers.

### What is the advantage of the Casio fx-CG50 in general calculations?

-The Casio fx-CG50 has the ability to give exact answers, such as simplified radical forms and fractions in simplest form, which the TI-84 Plus CE does not provide by default.

### How do the menu systems of the Casio fx-CG50 and TI-84 Plus CE differ?

-The Casio fx-CG50 uses a menu system that takes up less screen space and requires the use of contextual buttons to navigate, which can be confusing due to abbreviations. The TI-84 Plus CE uses a list-based menu system that takes up the entire screen, making it easier to understand and navigate.

### Which calculator performs faster in internal calculations?

-The Casio fx-CG50 is significantly faster in internal calculations compared to the TI-84 Plus CE, as demonstrated in the speed tests in the script.

### How do the graphing speeds of the Casio fx-CG50 and TI-84 Plus CE compare?

-The Casio fx-CG50 graphs functions more quickly than the TI-84 Plus CE, which can be slow and require waiting for the screen to redraw after zooming in or out.

### What unique feature does the Casio fx-CG50 have that the TI-84 Plus CE does not?

-The Casio fx-CG50 has a 3D graphing feature, which is not available on the TI-84 Plus CE.

### Which calculator is more widely used in high school math classes?

-The TI-84 Plus CE is more widely used and often required in high school math classes, although the Casio fx-CG50 is presented as a capable and cheaper alternative.

### Outlines

### π Hardware Comparison of TI-84 Plus CE and Casio FX CG50

This paragraph compares the hardware features of two calculators, the TI-84 Plus CE and the Casio FX CG50. Both calculators have a similar size and shape with comparable button layouts. The TI-84 Plus CE is slimmer due to its built-in rechargeable lithium-ion battery, while the Casio FX CG50 uses AAA batteries, making it bulkier. The TI-84 Plus CE's rechargeable battery offers convenience but may require recharging, whereas the Casio's AAA batteries can be replaced easily but need regular replacement. The Casio also allows for the use of rechargeable AAA batteries with a charging cord. Both calculators feature high-resolution color screens with the Casio's being slightly larger. The TI-84 Plus CE comes in various colors, including a gold version, and has a plain matte plastic back, whereas the Casio has a fake carbon fiber pattern.

### π Software and Performance Review of Graphing Calculators

This section delves into the software and operating systems of the TI-84 Plus CE and the Casio FX CG50, focusing on their main home calculation screens and the user interface. Neither calculator has a computer algebra system, limiting their capabilities with letter variables and equations without numeric answers. However, the Casio excels in providing exact answers, such as simplified radical forms and fractions, which the TI-84 Plus CE does not offer. The paragraph also highlights the menu systems of both calculators, with the TI-84 Plus CE's full-screen list being preferred over the Casio's smaller, more abbreviated menu. Speed tests reveal that the Casio calculator is significantly faster in performing complex calculations and graphing, which can be crucial for users requiring quick results. Both calculators offer similar app functionalities, including spreadsheets, graphing conic sections, value tables, and equation solvers, with the TI-84 Plus CE's equation solver being more intuitive.

### π Advanced Features and 3D Graphing Capabilities

The final paragraph discusses advanced features of the two calculators, emphasizing the programming interfaces, financial functions, unit conversion apps, and periodic tables. The TI-84 Plus CE provides more detailed information about elements in its periodic table compared to the Casio's basic information. A notable difference is the Casio FX CG50's ability to perform 3D graphing, a feature absent in the TI-84 Plus CE. The Casio allows users to graph up to three functions simultaneously and offers templates for entering functions or graphing generic 3D and parametric functions. The paragraph concludes by summarizing the comparison, stating that while the TI-84 Plus CE is more widely used in high school math classes, the Casio FX CG50 is a capable and cost-effective alternative that is not as well-known.

### Mindmap

### Keywords

### π‘TI-84 Plus CE

### π‘Casio fx-CG50

### π‘Hardware

### π‘Rechargeable Battery

### π‘AAA Batteries

### π‘Color Screen

### π‘Computer Algebra System (CAS)

### π‘Exact Answers

### π‘Graphing Speed

### π‘3D Graphing

### π‘Programming Interface

### Highlights

Comparison of the TI-84 Plus CE and Casio fx-CG50 graphing calculators.

Both calculators have similar hardware with a difference in thickness due to the power source.

TI-84 Plus CE is slimmer with a built-in rechargeable battery, while Casio uses AAA batteries.

Casio's use of AAA batteries offers longer usage time but requires replacement when depleted.

Casio calculators can use rechargeable AAA batteries with a charging cord.

Both calculators feature high-resolution color screens with slightly different dimensions.

Casio has a fake carbon fiber pattern, while TI-84 Plus has plain matte plastic.

TI-84 Plus is available in various colors, including gold.

Neither calculator has a computer algebra system, limiting operations with letter variables.

Casio excels in providing exact answers, including simplified radical and fraction forms.

Casio allows toggling between decimal and exact forms for trigonometric functions.

Both calculators have a menu for advanced functions like derivatives and integrals.

Casio's menu system is criticized for using more abbreviations and smaller screen space.

Speed tests show Casio performing calculations significantly faster than TI-84 Plus CE.

Casio's graphing speed is notably faster, reducing wait times for function visualization.

Both calculators offer similar graphing features, including maximum, minimum, and intersect values.

Casio's 3D graphing feature is a notable advantage over the TI-84 Plus CE.

Casio provides a more detailed periodic table with extensive information on elements.

Casio fx-CG50 is a capable and cost-effective alternative to the widely used TI-84 Plus CE.

## Casual Browsing

Casio fx-991CW Scientific Calculator Review

2024-09-27 09:45:00

How to use the Algebra Solver on the TI-84 Plus

2024-09-11 06:00:00

Is Casio fx-991-CW the BEST NON-GRAPHING CALCULATOR???

2024-09-12 01:44:01

Casio FX-991 EX classwiz calculator tutorial (perfect for algebra, FE exam, EIT exam)

2024-09-11 06:26:00

Numworks Graphing Calculator Review and Unboxing

2024-09-12 02:22:00

Review of mathpapa

2024-09-24 06:22:00